Log in

No account? Create an account
Harry Potter and the empty landscape  
11:20pm 23/01/2011
Diana L. Paxson
Finally got to see /Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows I/ last Friday. I've read the book, and I was interested to see that the more relaxed pacing resulting from splitting the novel allowed more time for the actors to show their response to events. But I noticed something else as well.

This is the first of the stories to spend much time outdoors. The first six books take place mostly at Hogwarts, with some scenes in London, magical or muggle, and suburbia. The thing that struck me is that although there are magical creatures outdoors at Hogwarts, and references to magical beings elsewhere, except at Hogwarts, we never see them.

Specifically, in the seventh book, while Harry et al. are doing their "See Beautiful Britain" tour, bouncing from one campsite to another, not only do they not encounter other humans, they don't see any animals, nor do they encounter any magical beings-- there's not a nymph or dryad, dwarf or fairy, to be seen. Rowling's universe, however engaging, is essentially sterile. The magic is no more than an unusually colorful technology. The books are about virtue, not spirituality.

This observation is not exactly news-- I think that most pagans like the books for almost every reason /except/ the magic. Perhaps it was the emptiness of the lonely, lovely settings where a magically sensitive soul should have found spirits galore that brought it home. Having recently re-read Diane Duane's "Young Wizard" series, in which studying wizardry teaches one to perceive the magic in all Life, I couldn't help regretting thinking that Rowling's universe suffers by comparison. Harry and his friends are muggles in the natural world.
    Post - Read 4 - - Link

(no subject)
01:18pm 24/01/2011 (UTC)
David Pollard
I always thought that the sterility of the landscapes in that book was in response to the situation with Voldemort. The (super)natural world was in parallel to Harry by going into hiding.
    Reply - Thread - span>Link
(no subject)
01:27pm 24/01/2011 (UTC)
Sherwood Smith
Yep--well, Rowling's magic doesnt really do anything except some domestic chores and help them to fight each other.
    Reply - Thread - span>Link
(no subject) - (Anonymous)
(no subject)
07:12am 25/01/2011 (UTC)
I love Diane Duane's books and am trying to get a copy of all of them for my girls(aged 10 and 12) I read them the first book(The only one out library had)

One other "magic" series I found I liked- The Faire Folk Trilogy by Gillian Summers.
    Reply - Parent - span>Thread - span>Link
(no subject)
02:05pm 25/01/2011 (UTC)
Now that you mention it....I can't believe I didn't notice this before!
    Reply - Thread - span>Link

  Previous Entry
Next Entry
February 2012  

  Powered by